This article explores the intersections between discourses on children from the North and South (India as a case in point). Some similarities can be seen between Western and Indian conceptualizations with the child occupying subaltern spaces. Both in the North and South children are marginalized in sociological discourses; there is a perceived emergent decrease in patriarchal control of children by adults, with adult-child relations becoming more democratic and participatory, manifested in greater negotiation of control by children. The New Sociology of Childhood that evolved in the “Century of the Child” notable as childhood has brought children into the arena of International politics and academic debates in both the North and the South.
Published in | Social Sciences (Volume 7, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ss.20180701.15 |
Page(s) | 29-35 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Social Construction, Convergence, Divergence, Childhoods, Agency
[1] | P. Aries, “Centuries of Childhood”, Penguin Books, 1962/1996. |
[2] | H. Cunnigham, “The Invention of Childhood”, BBS Books, 2006. |
[3] | L. deMause (ed). “The History of Childhood”, Bellew, 1976. |
[4] | H. Hendricks, “Children, Childhood and English Society, 1880-1990”, Cambridge University Press, 1997. |
[5] | S. M. Banerjee, “Unravelling the family story: children and childhood in colonial Bengal”, 2003. Retrieved from http://www.uhu.es/ijdar/10.4192/1577-8517-v9_7.pdf accessed February 2012. |
[6] | S. K. Kakar, “The Inner World – A Psycho-analytical study of Childhood and Society In India”, Oxford: Oxford University ¬¬Press Publication, 1981. |
[7] | M. Borthwick, “Changing Role of Women in Bengal 1849-1905”, Princeton, 1984. |
[8] | D. Chakrabarty, “The Difference-Deferral of a Colonial Modernity: Public Debates on Domesticity in British India”, History Workshop # 36 (autumn) pp. 1-34, 1993. |
[9] | G. Forbes, “Women in Modern India”, Cambridge, UK, 1996. |
[10] | T. Sarkar, “The Hindu Wife and the Hindu Nation: Domesticity and Nationalism in Nineteenth Century Bengal” in Studies in History, 8, 2, n.s. 1992. |
[11] | N. Burra, Born to Work: “Child Labor in India”, Delhi, 1995. |
[12] | M. Werner, “The Child and the State in India”, Delhi, 1991. |
[13] | E. Shorter, “The Making of the Modern Family”, Fontana, 1975. |
[14] | G. Dahlberg, P. Moss, and A. Pence, “Beyond Quality in Early Childhood Education and Care – Languages of Evaluation”, London: Routledge - Falmer Press, 2007. |
[15] | M. Meynert, “Conceptualizations of Childhood, Pedagogy and Educational Research in the Postmodern – A Critical Interpretation”, (Phil. lic dissertation), Department of Sociology, Division of Education, Faculty of Social Sciences, Lund University, Sweden, 2014. |
[16] | N. Postman, “The Disappearance of Childhood”, New York: Random House, 1982/1994. |
[17] | K. McDonnell, “Honey, We Lost the Kids: Re-thinking Childhood in the Multimedia Age”, Pluto Press, 2006. |
[18] | J. L. Kincheloe, “The sign of the burger: McDonald´s and the culture of power”, Temple University Press, 2002. |
[19] | J. Kotalová, “Belonging to Others – Cultural Construction of Womanhood among Muslims in a Village in Bangladesh”, Uppsala Studies in Cultural Anthropology, nr 19 (doctoral thesis), Acta Universitatiensis, Uppsala University. Uppsala: Uppsala University Press Publishers, 1993. |
[20] | D. Ali, “Courtly Culture and Political Life in Early Medieval India”, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. |
[21] | S. Sen, “Colonial Childhoods: The Juvenile Periphery of India, 1850–1945”, London: Anthem Press, 2005. |
[22] | V. Benei, “Schooling Passions: Nation, History and Language in Contemporary Western India”, Stanford: California University Press, 2008. |
[23] | M. Carrin, “Adivasi Children and the Making of Indigeneity in Jharkhand”, South Asian History & Culture 2015: 348–364. |
[24] | Froerer, Peggy. “Adivasi Young People and the Risk of Education in Rural Chhattisgarh”, South Asian History & Culture 2015: 365–379. |
[25] | R. Lukose, “Liberalization’s Children: Gender, Youth and Consumer Citizenship in Globalizing India”, NC: Duke University Press, 2009. |
[26] | A. McCarthy, “Telling Stories, Washing Hands: Exploring the Role of Narrative in Development Programs Targeting Children.” South Asian History & Culture 2015: 401–416, 2015. |
[27] | R. Bisht, “Who is a Child? The Adult’s Perspective within Adult-Child Relationship in India”, in Interpersona 2 (2), 151-172, 2008, retrieved from http://abpri.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/interpersona-22_2.pdf, accessed, February, 2012. |
[28] | B. Corbet, “Centuries of Children.” In Philosophy of Children, (1985) retrieved from: http://www.webster.edu/~corbetre/philosophy/ children/aries.html, accessed February, 2012. |
[29] | K. Kumar, “What is Worth Teaching?” Orient Blackswan, 20 |
[30] | M. J. Meynert, “Children without childhood – Proletarianization of Children and its Implication”, Sociology and Anthropology Vol. 5 (8), pp. 590 – 599, Horizon Research Publishing Corp, 2017. |
[31] | GOI, “National Child Labour project", Ministry of Labour and Employment, Government of India. Archived from the original on 9 September 2011. Retrieved 12 September 2011. |
[32] | T. R. Young, “CHAOS THEORY AND HUMAN AGENCY: Humanist Sociology in a Postmodern Era”, Virginia Polytechnic and State University, Apr., 1992, retrieved from http://critcrim.org/ redfeather/ chaos/007humanagency.html, accessed October 2017. |
[33] | G. Kurian and R. Gosh, “Changing Authority within the Context of Socialization in Indian Families”, in Social Science. Vol. 53, No. 1 (WINTER 1978), pp. 24-32, Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/41886219, accessed October 2017. |
[34] | A. James, and A. Prout, “Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood – Contemporary Issues in the Sociological Study of Childhood”, Cambridge: Polity Press Publication, 2007. |
[35] | W. A. Corsaro, “The Sociology of Children”, CA: Pine Forge Press, 2005. |
[36] | S. Banaji, “Children and Media in India: Narratives of Class, Agency and Social Change”, Routledge, 201, retrieved from https://www.questia.com/library/ journal/1P3-2508837491/boyhood-ideology -and-popular-hindi-cinema, accessed October 2017. |
[37] | S. Chattopadyay, “Boyhood, Ideology and Popular Hindi Cinema”, retrieved from https://www.questia.com/ library/journal/1P3-08837491/boyhood-ideology- and popular-hindi-cinema accessed October 2017. |
[38] | B. Bhadra (ed), “Readings in Indian Sociology: Volume III: Sociology of Childhood and Youth”, series editor I. Modi: Indian Sociolgy, Sage publication, 2013. |
[39] | J. Qvotrup, M. Bardy, and G. Sqritta, “Childhood Matters – Social Theory, Practice and Politics”, Avebury: European Centre Vienna Publishers, 1994. |
[40] | S. Balagopalan, “Introduction: Children´s lines and The Indian context”, Sage publication, 2011. |
APA Style
Mariam John Meynert. (2017). Intersections Between Western and Indian Childhoods. Social Sciences, 7(1), 29-35. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20180701.15
ACS Style
Mariam John Meynert. Intersections Between Western and Indian Childhoods. Soc. Sci. 2017, 7(1), 29-35. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20180701.15
AMA Style
Mariam John Meynert. Intersections Between Western and Indian Childhoods. Soc Sci. 2017;7(1):29-35. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20180701.15
@article{10.11648/j.ss.20180701.15, author = {Mariam John Meynert}, title = {Intersections Between Western and Indian Childhoods}, journal = {Social Sciences}, volume = {7}, number = {1}, pages = {29-35}, doi = {10.11648/j.ss.20180701.15}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20180701.15}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ss.20180701.15}, abstract = {This article explores the intersections between discourses on children from the North and South (India as a case in point). Some similarities can be seen between Western and Indian conceptualizations with the child occupying subaltern spaces. Both in the North and South children are marginalized in sociological discourses; there is a perceived emergent decrease in patriarchal control of children by adults, with adult-child relations becoming more democratic and participatory, manifested in greater negotiation of control by children. The New Sociology of Childhood that evolved in the “Century of the Child” notable as childhood has brought children into the arena of International politics and academic debates in both the North and the South.}, year = {2017} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Intersections Between Western and Indian Childhoods AU - Mariam John Meynert Y1 - 2017/12/14 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20180701.15 DO - 10.11648/j.ss.20180701.15 T2 - Social Sciences JF - Social Sciences JO - Social Sciences SP - 29 EP - 35 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2326-988X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20180701.15 AB - This article explores the intersections between discourses on children from the North and South (India as a case in point). Some similarities can be seen between Western and Indian conceptualizations with the child occupying subaltern spaces. Both in the North and South children are marginalized in sociological discourses; there is a perceived emergent decrease in patriarchal control of children by adults, with adult-child relations becoming more democratic and participatory, manifested in greater negotiation of control by children. The New Sociology of Childhood that evolved in the “Century of the Child” notable as childhood has brought children into the arena of International politics and academic debates in both the North and the South. VL - 7 IS - 1 ER -