Intrinsic control and self-management are playing an increasingly indispensable role in personal development. In the meantime, as the core of inner influence, self-leadership tends to be more prominent in the procedure of self-management. And in the process of students' growth, home education and school education are two complementary and critical nurturing roles. The key point of this paper is whether the students’ self-leadership level could be effectively improved through the specific guidance of family and school. Therefore, on the basis of the existing theories, this paper firstly reviews the self-leadership theory in the past three decades, together with its research content. Then this paper analyses the components of self-leadership strategy as well as its shaping effect on behaviors and thought. It is generally accepted that the self-leadership strategy could be divided into three main dimensions which are behavior-focused, natural reward and constructive thought pattern strategies. Finally, this study explores the antecedent influence of parenting styles and leadership education on college students' self-leadership level from a novel perspective via the revised Chinese version of RSLQ and the revised Chinese version of EMBU. Through empirical research and detailed data analysis, this study successfully verifies the dual role of family and school in self-leadership cultivation.
| Published in | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences (Volume 9, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.pbs.20200902.13 |
| Page(s) | 17-23 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Self-Leadership, Parenting Styles, Leadership Education, Intrinsic Control
| [1] | Manz, C. C., “Self-leadership: toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations,” Academy of Management Review, 1986, Vol. 11, pp. 585-600. |
| [2] | Manz, C. C. and Neck, C. P., “Mastering self-leadership: Empowering yourself for personal excellence,” 3rd ed., Pearson Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2004, NJ. |
| [3] | Neubert M J, and Wu J C C. “An investigation of the generalizability of the Houghton and Neck revised self -leadership questionnaire to a Chinese context,” Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2006, Vol. 21, pp. 360-373. |
| [4] | Christopher P. Neck, Hossein Nouri, and Jeffrey L. Godwin. “How self-leadership affects the goal-setting process,” Human Resource Management Review, 2003, Vol. 13. |
| [5] | Stewart G L, Courtright S H, and Manz C C. “Self-leadership: A multilevel review. Journal of Management,” 2011, Vol. 37, pp. 185-222. |
| [6] | Ghosh, and Koustab. “Developing organizational creativity and innovation,” Management Research Review, 2015, Vol. 38, pp. 1126-1148. |
| [7] | Greg L. Stewart, Stephen H. Courtright, and Charles C. Manz. “Self-leadership: A paradoxical core of organizational behavior,” Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2019, Vol. 6, pp. 47-67. |
| [8] | De Rue DS, and Ashford SJ. “Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations,” Acad. Manag. Rev, 2010, Vol. 35, pp. 627–47. |
| [9] | Kerr, S. and Jermier, J. M., “Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement,” Organization Behavior and Human Performance, 1978, Vol. 22, pp. 375-403. |
| [10] | Manz, C. C. and Sims, H. P. Jr, “Self-management as a substitute for leadership: A social learning perspective,” Academy of Management Review, 1980, Vol. 5, pp. 361-7. |
| [11] | Bandura A. “Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory,” Englewood Cliffs, 1986, NJ: Prentice-Hall. |
| [12] | Luthans F, and Kreitner R. “Organizational behavioral modification and beyond,” Glenview, 1985, IL: Scott Foresman. |
| [13] | Schunk D H, and Zimmerman B J. “Social origins of self-regulatory competence,” Educational Psychologist, 1997, Vol. 32, pp. 195. |
| [14] | Andrasik F, and Heimberg JS. “Self-management procedures,” In Handbook of Organizational Behavior Management, ed. LW Frederickson, 1982, pp. 219-47. New York: Wiley. |
| [15] | Manz, C. C. “The art of self-leadership: Strategies for personal effectiveness in your life and work,” Upper Saddle River, 1983, NJ: Prentice Hall. |
| [16] | Neck C P, Manz, C. C., and Houghton JD. “Self-leadership: The definitive guide to personal excellence,” Thousand Oaks, 2017, CA: Sage. |
| [17] | Anderson J S, and Prussia G E. “The self-leadership questionnaire: Preliminary assessment of construct validity,” Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 1997, Vol. 4, pp. 119-143. |
| [18] | Houghton J D, and Neck C P. “The revised self-leadership questionnaire: Testing a hierarchical factor structure for self-leadership,” Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2002, Vol. 17, pp. 672-691. |
| [19] | Neubert M J, and Cindy Wu J C. “An investigation of the generalizability of the Houghton and Neck Revised Self-Leadership Questionnaire to a Chinese context,” Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2006, Vol. 21, pp. 360-373. |
| [20] | Locke, E. A. and Latham, G. P., “A theory of goal setting and task performance,” Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1990, NJ. |
| [21] | Locke Edwin, Schweiger David, and Latham Gary. “Participation in decision making: When should it be used?” Organizational Dynamics, 1986, Vol. 14, pp. 65-79. |
| [22] | Locke Edwin, and Schippers Michaéla. “Improving lives: personal goal setting boosts student performance and happiness,” Academy of Management Proceedings, 2018, 16790. 10.5465/AMBPP.2018.16790symposium. |
| [23] | Mahoney MJ, and Arnkoff DB. “Self-management: Theory, research, and application,” In Behavioral Medicine: Theory and Practice, ed. JP Brady, D Pomerleau, 1979, pp. 75-96. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins. |
| [24] | Neck C P, and Manz C C. “Mastering self-leadership: Empowering yourself for personal excellence,” Pearson, 2010. |
| [25] | Inbar Yoel, Pizarro David, Gilovich Thomas, and Ariely, Dan. “Moral masochism: On the connection between guilt and self-punishment,” Emotion (Washington, D. C.). 2012, 13. 10.1037/a0029749. |
| [26] | Manz C C, and Sims H P. “The new super leadership: Leading others to lead themselves,” Berrett-Koehler, 2001. |
| [27] | Houghton J D, Neck C P, and Manz C C. “We think we can, we think we can, we think we can: The impact of thinking patterns and self-efficacy on work team sustainability,” Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 2003, Vol. 9, pp. 31-41. |
| [28] | Deci, E. and Ryan, R. “The support of autonomy and control of behavior,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1985, Vol. 53, pp. 1024-37. |
| [29] | Ilgen D R, and Hollenbeck J R. “The structure of work: Job design and roles,” Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1991, Vol. 2, pp. 165-207. |
| [30] | Long C S, Alifiah M N, Kowang T O, and Ching C W. “The relationship between self-leadership, personality and job satisfaction: A review,” Journal of Sustainable Development, 2015, Vol. 8, pp. 16. |
| [31] | Seibert S E, Crant J M, and Kraimer M L. “Proactive personality and career success,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 1999, Vol. 84, pp. 416. |
| [32] | Neck CP, and Manz CC. “Thought self-leadership: The impact of mental strategies training on employee cognition, behavior, and affect,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1996, Vol. 17, pp. 445-67. |
| [33] | Neck, C. P. and Manz, C. C. “Thought self-leadership: The impact of self-talk and mental imagery on performance”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1992, Vol. 12, pp. 681-99. |
| [34] | Theodorakis Y, Chroni S, Laparidis K, Bebetsos V, and Douma I. “Self-talk in a basketbal1. shooting task,” Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2001, Vol. 92, pp. 309-15. |
| [35] | Senay I, Albarracin D, and Noguchi K. “Motivating goal-directed behavior through introspective self-talk: The role of the interrogative form of simple future tense,” Psychological Science, 2010, Vol. 21, pp. 499-504. |
| [36] | Driskell, J. E., Copper, C. and Moran, A. “Does mental practice enhance performance?” Journal of Applied Psychology, 1994, Vol. 79, pp. 481-92. |
| [37] | Manz CC. “Taking the self-leadership high road: Smooth surface or potholes ahead?” Acad. Manag. Perspect. 2015, Vol. 29, pp. 132-51. |
| [38] | Manz, C. C. “Leading employees to be self-managing and beyond: Toward the establishment of self-leadership in organizations,” Journal of Management Systems, 1991, Vol. 3, pp. 15-24. |
| [39] | Nancy Darling, and Laurence Steinberg. “Parenting style as context: An integrative model,” Psychological Bulletin, 1993, Vol. 113. |
| [40] | Perris C, Jacobsson L, Lindström H, Von Knorring Lars, and Perris, H. “Development of a new inventory assessing memories of parental rearing behaviour.” Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1980, Vol. 61, pp. 265-74. |
| [41] | Misukanis, T. M., Bun, J. R., Mueller, R. A., and Louiselle, P. A., “Effects of parental authoritarianism and authoritativeness on self-esteem,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1988, Vol. 14, pp. 271-282. |
| [42] | Nicholls, J. G. “Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice and performance,” Psychological Review, 1984, Vol. 121, pp. 345-374. |
| [43] | Shavelson，R. J., Hubner, J. J., and Stanton，G. C. “Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations,” Review of Educational Research, 1976, Vol. 46, pp. 407-441. |
| [44] | Jones, M. H., Audley-Piotrowski, S. R., and Kiefer, S. M. “Relationships among adolescents’ perceptions of friends’ behaviors, academic self-concept, and math performance,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 2012, Vol. 104, pp. 19. |
| [45] | Prabhu, V., Sutton, C., and Sauser, W. “Creativity and certain personality traits: Understanding the mediating effect of intrinsic motivation,” Creativity Research Journal, 2008, Vol. 20, pp. 53-66. |
| [46] | Ross Michael, Campbell R, Clayer J. “New inventory for measurement of parental rearing patterns: An English form of the EMBU,” Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1983, Vol. 66, pp. 499-507. |
| [47] | Tak Wing Chan, Anita Koo. “Parenting style and youth outcomes in the UK,” European Sociological Review, 2011, Vol. 3. |
APA Style
Yang Wen, Liu Baowei, Zhang Li. (2020). Cultivating College Students' Self-Leadership: The Dual Role of Family and School. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 9(2), 17-23. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20200902.13
ACS Style
Yang Wen; Liu Baowei; Zhang Li. Cultivating College Students' Self-Leadership: The Dual Role of Family and School. Psychol. Behav. Sci. 2020, 9(2), 17-23. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20200902.13
AMA Style
Yang Wen, Liu Baowei, Zhang Li. Cultivating College Students' Self-Leadership: The Dual Role of Family and School. Psychol Behav Sci. 2020;9(2):17-23. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20200902.13
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.pbs.20200902.13,
author = {Yang Wen and Liu Baowei and Zhang Li},
title = {Cultivating College Students' Self-Leadership: The Dual Role of Family and School},
journal = {Psychology and Behavioral Sciences},
volume = {9},
number = {2},
pages = {17-23},
doi = {10.11648/j.pbs.20200902.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20200902.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.pbs.20200902.13},
abstract = {Intrinsic control and self-management are playing an increasingly indispensable role in personal development. In the meantime, as the core of inner influence, self-leadership tends to be more prominent in the procedure of self-management. And in the process of students' growth, home education and school education are two complementary and critical nurturing roles. The key point of this paper is whether the students’ self-leadership level could be effectively improved through the specific guidance of family and school. Therefore, on the basis of the existing theories, this paper firstly reviews the self-leadership theory in the past three decades, together with its research content. Then this paper analyses the components of self-leadership strategy as well as its shaping effect on behaviors and thought. It is generally accepted that the self-leadership strategy could be divided into three main dimensions which are behavior-focused, natural reward and constructive thought pattern strategies. Finally, this study explores the antecedent influence of parenting styles and leadership education on college students' self-leadership level from a novel perspective via the revised Chinese version of RSLQ and the revised Chinese version of EMBU. Through empirical research and detailed data analysis, this study successfully verifies the dual role of family and school in self-leadership cultivation.},
year = {2020}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Cultivating College Students' Self-Leadership: The Dual Role of Family and School AU - Yang Wen AU - Liu Baowei AU - Zhang Li Y1 - 2020/05/27 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20200902.13 DO - 10.11648/j.pbs.20200902.13 T2 - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences JF - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences JO - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences SP - 17 EP - 23 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-7845 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20200902.13 AB - Intrinsic control and self-management are playing an increasingly indispensable role in personal development. In the meantime, as the core of inner influence, self-leadership tends to be more prominent in the procedure of self-management. And in the process of students' growth, home education and school education are two complementary and critical nurturing roles. The key point of this paper is whether the students’ self-leadership level could be effectively improved through the specific guidance of family and school. Therefore, on the basis of the existing theories, this paper firstly reviews the self-leadership theory in the past three decades, together with its research content. Then this paper analyses the components of self-leadership strategy as well as its shaping effect on behaviors and thought. It is generally accepted that the self-leadership strategy could be divided into three main dimensions which are behavior-focused, natural reward and constructive thought pattern strategies. Finally, this study explores the antecedent influence of parenting styles and leadership education on college students' self-leadership level from a novel perspective via the revised Chinese version of RSLQ and the revised Chinese version of EMBU. Through empirical research and detailed data analysis, this study successfully verifies the dual role of family and school in self-leadership cultivation. VL - 9 IS - 2 ER -
Email: