Management Versus Science: Peer-Reviewers do not Know the Subject They Have to Analyse

Fausto Galetto

doi:doi:10.11648/j.jim.20150406.15

| Peer-Reviewed

Management Versus Science: Peer-Reviewers do not Know the Subject They Have to Analyse

Fausto Galetto

Published in Journal of Investment and Management (Volume 4, Issue 6)

Received: 20 July 2015 Accepted: 10 August 2015 Published: 29 August 2015

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to show the ideas to overcome the deep ignorance on Reliability Theory of some authors and Referees (mainly professors). We analyzed some very few cases, taken from some published documents found on the web: Montgomery, Rade, M. A. El-Damcese [paper 41], M. A. El-Damcese, A. N. Salem, and N. S. Temraz [paper 42], and others (Wang, Pham, Xie, Peretto); two cases are from the Montgomery book, a very WWU (World Wide Used) Book; other cases are from books: we show that high scores on documents do not prove the Quality of those documents. This paper is especially written to settle the matter for the researchers who want to learn Reliability and Availability. Researchers must be alert in order to do a good job…. Many others cases should be shown: the paper should be 10 times longer The methods used are the Logic and the Scientific Theory (Mathematics, Probability, Statistics, Physics…). Several Professors do not practice them.

Published in	Journal of Investment and Management (Volume 4, Issue 6)
DOI	10.11648/j.jim.20150406.15
Page(s)	319-329
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Reliability, Availability, Integral Theory, Quality Methods, Scientific Approach, Intellectual Honesty

References

[1]	BRONE S, ERTO P, LANZOTTI A (2001), “Beyond robust design methodologies: an elementary example of synergy between statistics and advanced engineering design”, SIS Sperimentare per la Qualità, Turin February 2001
[2]	BORSELLINO C., LO CASTO S., MARAGIOGLIO G., RUISI V. (1999), “Thermovision temperature mapsevaluation in turningoperation”, 3rd AITEM 99, Brescia
[3]	CAPELLO E., SEMERARO Q. (1999), “Residual stresses in turning”, 3rd AITEM 99, Brescia
[4]	CARRINO L., GIULIANO G., POLINI W. (2000), “New method to characterise superplastic materials in comparison with alternative methods”, Int. Manufacturing Conference in China, Hong Kong
[5]	DEMING W.E. (1986), Out of the crisis, Cambridge Press
[6]	DEMING W.E. (1997), The new economics for industry, government, education, Cambridge Press
[7]	GALETTO F. (1978), “An application of experimental design in the Automotive field”, SIA Congress
[8]	GALETTO F. (1984)“Assessment of Product Reliability”, World Quality Congress '84, Brighton
[9]	GALETTO F. (1986)“Quality/Reliability: How to get results”, EOQC (Automotive Section), Madrid
[10]	GALETTO F. (1987)“Quality and Reliability, the Iveco way”, Mgt Dev. Review by MCE, Brussells
[11]	GALETTO F. (1988)“Quality and reliability. A must for industry”, ISATA, Montecarlo
[12]	GALETTO F. (1989)“Quality of methods for quality is important”, EOQC Conference, Vienna
[13]	GALETTO F. (1990)“Basic and managerial concerns on Taguchi Methods”, ISATA, Florence
[14]	GALETTO F., LEVI R. (93)“Planned Experiments: key factors for product Quality”, 3rd AMST 93, Udine
[15]	GALETTO F. (1993) “DOE. Importanti idee sulla Qualità per i manager”, DEINDE, Torino
[16]	GALETTO F. (1993) “Which kind of Quality? Of products, of processes, of Management?”, 1st AITEM, Ancona
[17]	GALETTO F. (1995) Affidabilità, Volume 1: Teoria e Metodi di Calcolo, CLEUP, Padova.
[18]	GALETTO F. (1995) Affidabilità, Volume 2: Prove di affidabilità, CLEUP, Padova.
[19]	GALETTO F. (1996)“Managerial Issues for Design of Experiments”, 4th AMST 96, Udine
[20]	GALETTO F. (1997)“We need Quality of Managers”, Quality 97 6th Int. Conf., Ostrava, Czeh Republic
[21]	GALETTO F. (1998)“Quality Education on Quality for Future Managers”, 1st Conference on TQM for Higher Education Institutions, Toulon
[22]	GALETTO F. (1999)“GIQA, the Golden Integral Quality Approach: from Management of Quality to Quality of Management”, Total Quality Management, Vol. 10, No. 1
[23]	GALETTO F. (1999)“Quality Methods for Design of Experiments”, 5th AMST 99, Udine
[24]	GALETTO F. (1999)“Quality Function Deployment, Some Managerial Concerns”, AITEM99, Brescia
[25]	GALETTO F., GENTILI E. (1999), “The need of Quality Methods used for Quality”,CAPE '99, Durham, UK
[26]	GALETTO F., GENTILI E. (1999), “Quality of the Quality Methods”, AITEM 99 Conference, Brescia
[27]	GALETTO F. (99)“Quality Education on Total Quality Management” 2nd Conf. on TQM for HEI, Verona
[28]	GALETTO F., GENTILI E. (2000), “In search of Quality in QFD and Taguchi methods”, CAPE
[29]	GALETTO F. (2000) Qualità. Alcuni metodi statistici da Manager, CLUT, Torino
[30]	MONTGOMERY D.C. (1996), Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, Wiley & Sons (many drawbacks)
[31]	PARK S. (1996), Robust Design and Analysis for Quality Engineering, Chapman& Hall, London
[32]	WATZLAWITCK P. (1976) La realtà della realtà, Astrolabio, Roma
[33]	YIN G.Z., JILLIE D.W. (1987), “Orthogonal Design for Process Optimisation and its Application in Plasma Etching”, Solid State Technology, (may 87)
[34]	W. Eureka, N. E. Ryan The Customer driven Company: Managerial Perspectives on QFD, ASI Press, 1989
[35]	C. Casciano (L. Peretto referee), Thesis on the Taguchi Method, Bologna University 2014
[36]	J. Z. Zhang et al., “Surface roughness optimization … using the Taguchi design Method”, Journal of Material Processing Technology 184(2007) 233-239
[37]	Research Gate, Papers and Questions&Answers
[38]	GALETTO F. (2014) “Bibiliometrics: Help or Hoax for Quality?” UJER 2(4), DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2014.020404
[39]	GALETTO F. (2014) QualityPedia Project. Volume 1, Chapter 1, Research Gate
[40]	GALETTO F. (2014) “Riemann Hypothesis Proved”, Academia Arena 2014;6(12):19-22]. (ISSN 1553-992X).
[41]	M. A. El-Damcese. “Reliability Equivalence Analysis of a Parallel-Series System Subject to Degradation Facility.” Science Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics. Vol. 3, No. 3, 2015, pp. 160-164. doi: 10.11648/j.sjams.20150303.19
[42]	M. A. El-Damcese, A. N. Salem, and N. S. Temraz “Semi-Markov Model of a Series-Parallel System Subject to Preventive Maintenance”, J. Stat. Appl. Pro. 2, No. 3, 307-318 (2013)
[43]	GALETTO F. (2014) “Hope for the Future: Overcoming the DEEP Ignorance on the CI (Confidence Intervals) and on the DOE (Design of Experiments)”. Science Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics. Vol. 3, No. 3, 2015, pp. 99-123. doi:10.11648/j.sjams.20150303.14 DOE 10.11648. j.sjams.20150303.14
[44]	M. Xie, Y-S Dai, K-L Poh, (2004) Computing System Reliability, Kluwer Academic Publishers
[45]	T. Nakagawa, (2005) Maintenance Theory of Reliability, Springer
[46]	H. Wang, H. Pham, (2006) Reliability and Optimal Maintenance, Springer
[47]	H. Pham (2003), Handbook of Reliability Engineering, Springer
[48]	M. Lazzaroni, L. Cristaldi, L. Peretto, P. Rinaldi, M. Catelani, (2003), Reliability Engineering, Springer
[49]	MONTGOMERY D.C. (2006), Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, 6th edition, Wiley & Sons (many more drawbacks than 1996)
[50]	K. Bouacha, M. A. Yallese, S. Khamel, S. Belhadi, Analysis and optimization of hard turning operation using cubic boron nitride tool
[51]	D. Jurków, application of design of the experiment(DoE) in simulations of passive low temperature co-fired ceramics (LTCC) coolers
[52]	D. Jurków, Application of Design of the Experiment in Preliminary Investigations on the end Milling of Low Temperature Co-fired Ceramics, Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol., 10 [4] 671–681 (2013) DOI: 10.1111/ j.1744-7402.2012.02763.x
[53]	M. S. Sukumar*, B. V. Sudheer Reddy, P. Venkataramaiah, (2015), Analysis on Multi Responses in Face Milling of Ammc Using Fuzzy-Taguchi Method, Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, 2015, 3, 255-270 Published Online July 2015 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/jmmce
[54]	J. Martinez, (2008) Application of reliability-Centered Maintenance in Facility Management, Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Worcester Polytechnic Institute.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Fausto Galetto. (2015). Management Versus Science: Peer-Reviewers do not Know the Subject They Have to Analyse. Journal of Investment and Management, 4(6), 319-329. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jim.20150406.15

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Fausto Galetto. Management Versus Science: Peer-Reviewers do not Know the Subject They Have to Analyse. J. Invest. Manag. 2015, 4(6), 319-329. doi: 10.11648/j.jim.20150406.15

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Fausto Galetto. Management Versus Science: Peer-Reviewers do not Know the Subject They Have to Analyse. J Invest Manag. 2015;4(6):319-329. doi: 10.11648/j.jim.20150406.15

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jim.20150406.15,
  author = {Fausto Galetto},
  title = {Management Versus Science: Peer-Reviewers do not Know the Subject They Have to Analyse},
  journal = {Journal of Investment and Management},
  volume = {4},
  number = {6},
  pages = {319-329},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jim.20150406.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jim.20150406.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jim.20150406.15},
  abstract = {The purpose of this paper is to show the ideas to overcome the deep ignorance on Reliability Theory of some authors and Referees (mainly professors). We analyzed some very few cases, taken from some published documents found on the web: Montgomery, Rade, M. A. El-Damcese [paper 41], M. A. El-Damcese, A. N. Salem, and N. S. Temraz [paper 42], and others (Wang, Pham, Xie, Peretto); two cases are from the Montgomery book, a very WWU (World Wide Used) Book; other cases are from books: we show that high scores on documents do not prove the Quality of those documents. This paper is especially written to settle the matter for the researchers who want to learn Reliability and Availability. Researchers must be alert in order to do a good job…. Many others cases should be shown: the paper should be 10 times longer The methods used are the Logic and the Scientific Theory (Mathematics, Probability, Statistics, Physics…). Several Professors do not practice them.},
 year = {2015}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Management Versus Science: Peer-Reviewers do not Know the Subject They Have to Analyse
AU  - Fausto Galetto
Y1  - 2015/08/29
PY  - 2015
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jim.20150406.15
DO  - 10.11648/j.jim.20150406.15
T2  - Journal of Investment and Management
JF  - Journal of Investment and Management
JO  - Journal of Investment and Management
SP  - 319
EP  - 329
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-7721
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jim.20150406.15
AB  - The purpose of this paper is to show the ideas to overcome the deep ignorance on Reliability Theory of some authors and Referees (mainly professors). We analyzed some very few cases, taken from some published documents found on the web: Montgomery, Rade, M. A. El-Damcese [paper 41], M. A. El-Damcese, A. N. Salem, and N. S. Temraz [paper 42], and others (Wang, Pham, Xie, Peretto); two cases are from the Montgomery book, a very WWU (World Wide Used) Book; other cases are from books: we show that high scores on documents do not prove the Quality of those documents. This paper is especially written to settle the matter for the researchers who want to learn Reliability and Availability. Researchers must be alert in order to do a good job…. Many others cases should be shown: the paper should be 10 times longer The methods used are the Logic and the Scientific Theory (Mathematics, Probability, Statistics, Physics…). Several Professors do not practice them.
VL  - 4
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Fausto Galetto

Industrial Quality Management, Politecnico Di Torino, Turin, Italy

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Fausto Galetto. (2015). Management Versus Science: Peer-Reviewers do not Know the Subject They Have to Analyse. Journal of Investment and Management, 4(6), 319-329. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jim.20150406.15

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Fausto Galetto. Management Versus Science: Peer-Reviewers do not Know the Subject They Have to Analyse. J. Invest. Manag. 2015, 4(6), 319-329. doi: 10.11648/j.jim.20150406.15

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Fausto Galetto. Management Versus Science: Peer-Reviewers do not Know the Subject They Have to Analyse. J Invest Manag. 2015;4(6):319-329. doi: 10.11648/j.jim.20150406.15

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jim.20150406.15,
  author = {Fausto Galetto},
  title = {Management Versus Science: Peer-Reviewers do not Know the Subject They Have to Analyse},
  journal = {Journal of Investment and Management},
  volume = {4},
  number = {6},
  pages = {319-329},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jim.20150406.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jim.20150406.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jim.20150406.15},
  abstract = {The purpose of this paper is to show the ideas to overcome the deep ignorance on Reliability Theory of some authors and Referees (mainly professors). We analyzed some very few cases, taken from some published documents found on the web: Montgomery, Rade, M. A. El-Damcese [paper 41], M. A. El-Damcese, A. N. Salem, and N. S. Temraz [paper 42], and others (Wang, Pham, Xie, Peretto); two cases are from the Montgomery book, a very WWU (World Wide Used) Book; other cases are from books: we show that high scores on documents do not prove the Quality of those documents. This paper is especially written to settle the matter for the researchers who want to learn Reliability and Availability. Researchers must be alert in order to do a good job…. Many others cases should be shown: the paper should be 10 times longer The methods used are the Logic and the Scientific Theory (Mathematics, Probability, Statistics, Physics…). Several Professors do not practice them.},
 year = {2015}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Management Versus Science: Peer-Reviewers do not Know the Subject They Have to Analyse
AU  - Fausto Galetto
Y1  - 2015/08/29
PY  - 2015
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jim.20150406.15
DO  - 10.11648/j.jim.20150406.15
T2  - Journal of Investment and Management
JF  - Journal of Investment and Management
JO  - Journal of Investment and Management
SP  - 319
EP  - 329
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-7721
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jim.20150406.15
AB  - The purpose of this paper is to show the ideas to overcome the deep ignorance on Reliability Theory of some authors and Referees (mainly professors). We analyzed some very few cases, taken from some published documents found on the web: Montgomery, Rade, M. A. El-Damcese [paper 41], M. A. El-Damcese, A. N. Salem, and N. S. Temraz [paper 42], and others (Wang, Pham, Xie, Peretto); two cases are from the Montgomery book, a very WWU (World Wide Used) Book; other cases are from books: we show that high scores on documents do not prove the Quality of those documents. This paper is especially written to settle the matter for the researchers who want to learn Reliability and Availability. Researchers must be alert in order to do a good job…. Many others cases should be shown: the paper should be 10 times longer The methods used are the Logic and the Scientific Theory (Mathematics, Probability, Statistics, Physics…). Several Professors do not practice them.
VL  - 4
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download