Background: Eichhornia crassipes (Mart) Solms and Nypa fruticans Wurmb (invasive halophyte) are alien aquatic flora highly troublesome with a consequence of altering sea route navigation, displacing traditional indigenous mangal species and general loss of mangrove biodiversity and aquatic lives. Both species are highly prolific with endowed untapped renewable biomass resources. Aim: This study was aimed at biotransforming Eichhornia crassipes and Nypa fruticans biomass for briquette production, with the objectives of converting them to biochar as an approach to sustainable aquatic weed management. Method: Standard procedures of sample collection, processing by sun drying / oven drying, carbonization, and densification methods and data analyses by ANOVA were adopted. Result: Result has recorded a significant difference (P < 0.05) between species, with Nypa fruticans higher in Ignition time (Kg/s) (50.67 ± 3.06); fixed carbon (%) (47.20 ± 2.38); burning time (Kg/s) (7368 ± 2049.26); bulk density (g) 3.54x10-4 ± 6.6x10-6, specific heat of combustion (Kcal/kg) (3620.86 ± 113.71) and a non-significant shattering resistance (%) (91.63 ± 9.48). Eichhornia crassipes had a significant water boiling test (Cm2/s) of 2080±150.99; moisture content (%) (34.38 ± 2.21); burning rate (Kg/s) 4.00 x10-6 ± 17.0x10-6, volatile matter (%) (32.75 ± 1.00) and ash content (%) (38.66 ± 1.86). Conclusion: Therefore, based on the result Nypa palm biomass can be a better energy source of briquette and with the use of aquatic plants as alternative option for renewable energy source of briquette, both species may not only serve as medium of conserving our forest but also help in clearing the water ways and control pollution.
Published in | Journal of Energy and Natural Resources (Volume 11, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jenr.20221104.12 |
Page(s) | 120-132 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Eichhornia crassipes, Nypa fruticans, Starch, Biochar, Biomass
[1] | Prabbat, K. R. (2016). Biomagnetic Monitoring of Particulate Matter. |
[2] | Environmental Management. (2017). Science and Engineering for Industry. https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780128119891/environmental-management. |
[3] | Jerry, A. N. (2020). Water pollution". Encyclopedia Britannica, 22 Dec. 2020, https://www.britannica.com/science/water-pollution. (Accessed 21 January, 2021). |
[4] | Dilip, K. & Deepak, K. (2016). Management of Cooking Coal Resources. https://www.elsevier.com/books/management-of-coking-coal-resources/kumar/978-0-12-803160-5. (Accessed 21 January, 2021). |
[5] | Chris W. (2019). Water Pollution: an introduction. https://www.explainthatstuff.com/waterpollution.html. (Retrieved 22 June, 2021). |
[6] | Ndinwa, C. C. G., Dittimi, P. J. & Akpafun, A. S. (2012). An Overview of Water Hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) Proliferation and its Environmental Consequences on the Deltas of Nigeria. Retrieved from cepajournal.com website: http://www.cepajournal.com/index.php?option=com_docman&task=cat_view&gid=41&Itemid=54&limitstart=5 (Accessed 21 January, 2021). |
[7] | Carnaje, P. N., Romel, B. T., Jose, P. P., Kalpit, S. & Jorge, P-f. (2018). Development and Characterization of Charcoal Briquettes from water Hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes)-Molasses Blend, Pp 1-2. |
[8] | Anthony, J. R., Martins, O. O., Patrick, O., Walter, A., Daniel, K. & Isaiah, M. (2014). Converting Water Hyacinth to Briquette. International Journal of Science and Basic Applied Research, 15 (1): 359-362. |
[9] | Toe, S., Ang, W. F., Lok, A. F. S. L., Kurula-Suriyal. B. R. & Tan, H. T. W. (2010). The Status and Distributing of the Nipa Palm in Singapore. Nat. Singapore, 3: 45-52. |
[10] | Ships and Ports (2016). Lagos Procures Equipment to tackle water hyacinth. Retrieved from http://shipsandport.com.ng/lagos-proceures-equipment-to-trackle-water-hyacinth/ |
[11] | Uka, U. N., Mohammed, H. A. & Ovie, S. I. (2017). Current diversity of aquatic macrophytes in Nigerian freshwater ecosystem. Brazilian Journal of Aquatic Science and Technology, 13 (2): 9-15. |
[12] | Sunderland, C. H. T. (2016). Nypa fruticans, a Weed in West Africa. African Rattan Research Programme C/O Limbe Botanical Garden B. P. 437 Limbe, Cameroon. 46 (3). |
[13] | LVEMP. (2014). Lake Victoria Environment Management Project 31 August, 2019 Nairobi, Kenny: World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/video/201/02/29/lake-victoria-environmental-management-project |
[14] | Zaranyika, M. F., Mdaproadza, T. & Kugara, J. (2015). Uplake of Ni, Zn, Fe, Co, Cr, Pb, Ca and Cd by Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crasspes) in Mukuvoir and Manyame rivers, Zimbabwe, Journal of Environmental science 30: 157-169. |
[15] | Misbahuddin, M. & Fariduddin, A. (2016). Water Hyacinth Removes Arsenic from Contaminated Drinking Water. Archives of Environmental Health, 57: 516-518. |
[16] | Malik, A. (2016). Environmental challenge visa-vis Opportunity: The case of Water Hyacinth Environmental International. 33: 122-138. |
[17] | Rezania, S., Dim, M. F., Kamaruddin, S. F., Taib, S. M., Singh, L., Yong, E. L. & Dahalan, F. A. (2016). Evaluation of Water Hyacinth (Eicchornia Crassipes) as Potential Raw Material Source for Briquette Production. Energy, 111: 768-773. |
[18] | Egwuogu, C. C., Okeke, H. U., Emenike, H. I. & Abayomi, T. A. (2016). Rainwater Quality Assessment in Obio/Akpor Local Government of Rivers State Nigeria. International Journal of Science and Technology 5 (8). |
[19] | Mfonobong, D. (2022). Nigerian infopedia. Retrieved 26 February, 2022 from https://nigerianinfopedia.com.ng. |
[20] | Dienye, H. E. & Woke, G. N. (2015). Pysico-chemical Parameters of the Upper and Lower Reach of the New Calabar River Niger Delta. Journal of Fisheries Livestock Production, 3: 154. |
[21] | Ezekiel, E. N., E. N. Ogamba, J. F. N. Abowei (2011). The Distribution and Seasonality of Zooplankton in Sombreiro River, Niger Delta, Nigeria. Current Research Journal of Biological Science; 3 (3): 234 –239. |
[22] | Lawal, O. J., Atanda, T. A., Ayanleye, S. O. & Iyiola, E. A. (2019). Pollution of Biomass Briquettes Using Coconut Husk and Male Inflorescence of Elaeis guineensis. Journal of Energy Research and Reviews. 3 (2): 1-9. |
[23] | Tembe, E. T., Otache, P. O. & Ekhuemelo, D. O. (2014). Density, shatter Index and combustion Properties of briquettes produced from groundnut shells, rice husks and Swadust of Daniella oliveri. Journal of Applied Biosciences 82: 7372-7378 ISSN, 1997-5902. |
[24] | Aboagye, G. B. (2017). Assessment of the Physical, and Combustion properties of briquettes produced from dried Coercion Husk. Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, College of Engineering. Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology Kumasi. Retrieved from https://www.idin.org/resources/student-papers/assessment-physical-and-combustion-properties-briquettes-produced-dried |
[25] | Emerchi, E. A. (2011). Physical and Combustion Properties of briquettes produced from Sawdust of three hardwood species and different organic binders. ISSN: 0976-8610. |
[26] | Onuegbu, T. U., Epunobi, U. E., Ogbu, I. M., Ekeoma, M. O. & Obumzelu, F. O. (2011). Comparative Studies of Ignition Time and Water Boiling Test of Coal and Biomass Briquettes Blend. 7 Issue//iJRRAS_7_Z_08.pdf |
[27] | Fuizel, H. M., Latiff, Z. A., Wahud, M. A. & Dans, A. N. (2019). Physical and Combustion Characteristics of Biomass Residues from Palm Oil Mills. |
[28] | Ghorpade, S. S. & Moule, A. P. (2006). Performance Evaluation of Deoiled Cashew Shell waste for fuel properties in Briquetted form. B. Tech. Thesis (unpub.), Dapoli 15. |
[29] | Sengar, S. H., Mohod, A. G., Khandetod, Y. P., Patil, S. S. & Chendake, A. D. (2012). Performance of Briquetting Machine for Briquette fuel. International Journal of Energy Engineering, 2 (1): 28-34. doi: 10.5923/j.ijee.20120201.05. |
[30] | Huang, J. (2014). Factors that Influence your briquettes burning. http//renewableenergyworld.com (26/07/2021). |
[31] | Raju, C. A. I., Ramya, J. K., Satya, M. & Praveena U. (2014). Studies on development of fuel briquettes for household and industrial purpose. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 3 (2). |
[32] | Aina, O. M., Adetogun, A. C. & Iyiola, K. A. (2009). Heat Energy from Value-Added Sawdust Briquettes of Albizia Zygia. Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and Management. 2: 1. |
[33] | Tumuluru, J. S., Wright, C. T., Kenny, K. L. & Hess, R. (2011). A Review on Biomass Densification Technologies for Energy Application. U.S. Department of Energy website http://www.inl.gov/technicalpublication/documents/4886679.pdf. |
[34] | Birwatkar, V. R., Khandetod, Y. P., Mohod, A. G. & Dhande, K. G. (2014). Physical and Thermal Properties of Biomass Briquetted Fuel. Ind. J. Sci. Res. and Tech. 2 (4): 55-62. |
[35] | Efomah, N. A. & Agidi, G. (2015). The Physical, Proximate and Ultimate Analysis of Rice Husk Briquettes Produced from a Vibratory Block Mould Briquetting Machine. ISSN 2348-7968. |
[36] | Kers, J., Kulu, P., Aruniit, A., Laumaa, V., Krizan, P., Soos, L. & Kask, U. (2010). Determination of Physical, Mechanical and Burning Characteristics of Polymeric Waste Material Briquettes. Journal of Engineering, 16: 307-316. |
[37] | Obi, O. F., Akubuo, C. O. & Okonkwo, W. I. (2013). Development of an Appropriate Briquetting Machine for Use in Rural Communities. 2 (4). |
[38] | Husain Z, Zainac Z, & Abdullah Z. (2002). Briquetting of palm fibre and shell from the processing of palm nuts to palm oil. Biomass and Bioenergy, 22: 505-509. |
APA Style
Nsirim Lucky Edwin-Wosu, Zinabari Confidence Dee-Ue. (2022). Briquetting of Aquatic Biomass Feedstock: An Untapped Ecological Potential as Alternative Source of Biofuel Energy for Sustainable Ecosystem Restoration. Journal of Energy and Natural Resources, 11(4), 120-132. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jenr.20221104.12
ACS Style
Nsirim Lucky Edwin-Wosu; Zinabari Confidence Dee-Ue. Briquetting of Aquatic Biomass Feedstock: An Untapped Ecological Potential as Alternative Source of Biofuel Energy for Sustainable Ecosystem Restoration. J. Energy Nat. Resour. 2022, 11(4), 120-132. doi: 10.11648/j.jenr.20221104.12
AMA Style
Nsirim Lucky Edwin-Wosu, Zinabari Confidence Dee-Ue. Briquetting of Aquatic Biomass Feedstock: An Untapped Ecological Potential as Alternative Source of Biofuel Energy for Sustainable Ecosystem Restoration. J Energy Nat Resour. 2022;11(4):120-132. doi: 10.11648/j.jenr.20221104.12
@article{10.11648/j.jenr.20221104.12, author = {Nsirim Lucky Edwin-Wosu and Zinabari Confidence Dee-Ue}, title = {Briquetting of Aquatic Biomass Feedstock: An Untapped Ecological Potential as Alternative Source of Biofuel Energy for Sustainable Ecosystem Restoration}, journal = {Journal of Energy and Natural Resources}, volume = {11}, number = {4}, pages = {120-132}, doi = {10.11648/j.jenr.20221104.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jenr.20221104.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jenr.20221104.12}, abstract = {Background: Eichhornia crassipes (Mart) Solms and Nypa fruticans Wurmb (invasive halophyte) are alien aquatic flora highly troublesome with a consequence of altering sea route navigation, displacing traditional indigenous mangal species and general loss of mangrove biodiversity and aquatic lives. Both species are highly prolific with endowed untapped renewable biomass resources. Aim: This study was aimed at biotransforming Eichhornia crassipes and Nypa fruticans biomass for briquette production, with the objectives of converting them to biochar as an approach to sustainable aquatic weed management. Method: Standard procedures of sample collection, processing by sun drying / oven drying, carbonization, and densification methods and data analyses by ANOVA were adopted. Result: Result has recorded a significant difference (P ) between species, with Nypa fruticans higher in Ignition time (Kg/s) (50.67 ± 3.06); fixed carbon (%) (47.20 ± 2.38); burning time (Kg/s) (7368 ± 2049.26); bulk density (g) 3.54x10-4 ± 6.6x10-6, specific heat of combustion (Kcal/kg) (3620.86 ± 113.71) and a non-significant shattering resistance (%) (91.63 ± 9.48). Eichhornia crassipes had a significant water boiling test (Cm2/s) of 2080±150.99; moisture content (%) (34.38 ± 2.21); burning rate (Kg/s) 4.00 x10-6 ± 17.0x10-6, volatile matter (%) (32.75 ± 1.00) and ash content (%) (38.66 ± 1.86). Conclusion: Therefore, based on the result Nypa palm biomass can be a better energy source of briquette and with the use of aquatic plants as alternative option for renewable energy source of briquette, both species may not only serve as medium of conserving our forest but also help in clearing the water ways and control pollution.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Briquetting of Aquatic Biomass Feedstock: An Untapped Ecological Potential as Alternative Source of Biofuel Energy for Sustainable Ecosystem Restoration AU - Nsirim Lucky Edwin-Wosu AU - Zinabari Confidence Dee-Ue Y1 - 2022/12/23 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jenr.20221104.12 DO - 10.11648/j.jenr.20221104.12 T2 - Journal of Energy and Natural Resources JF - Journal of Energy and Natural Resources JO - Journal of Energy and Natural Resources SP - 120 EP - 132 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-7404 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jenr.20221104.12 AB - Background: Eichhornia crassipes (Mart) Solms and Nypa fruticans Wurmb (invasive halophyte) are alien aquatic flora highly troublesome with a consequence of altering sea route navigation, displacing traditional indigenous mangal species and general loss of mangrove biodiversity and aquatic lives. Both species are highly prolific with endowed untapped renewable biomass resources. Aim: This study was aimed at biotransforming Eichhornia crassipes and Nypa fruticans biomass for briquette production, with the objectives of converting them to biochar as an approach to sustainable aquatic weed management. Method: Standard procedures of sample collection, processing by sun drying / oven drying, carbonization, and densification methods and data analyses by ANOVA were adopted. Result: Result has recorded a significant difference (P ) between species, with Nypa fruticans higher in Ignition time (Kg/s) (50.67 ± 3.06); fixed carbon (%) (47.20 ± 2.38); burning time (Kg/s) (7368 ± 2049.26); bulk density (g) 3.54x10-4 ± 6.6x10-6, specific heat of combustion (Kcal/kg) (3620.86 ± 113.71) and a non-significant shattering resistance (%) (91.63 ± 9.48). Eichhornia crassipes had a significant water boiling test (Cm2/s) of 2080±150.99; moisture content (%) (34.38 ± 2.21); burning rate (Kg/s) 4.00 x10-6 ± 17.0x10-6, volatile matter (%) (32.75 ± 1.00) and ash content (%) (38.66 ± 1.86). Conclusion: Therefore, based on the result Nypa palm biomass can be a better energy source of briquette and with the use of aquatic plants as alternative option for renewable energy source of briquette, both species may not only serve as medium of conserving our forest but also help in clearing the water ways and control pollution. VL - 11 IS - 4 ER -