| Peer-Reviewed

Physical Nature of Length Contraction (Part 2) How the Electron Elongates While Its Orbit Contracts

Received: 23 March 2019     Accepted: 30 April 2019     Published: 23 May 2019
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The recent discovery of the process/mechanism of the total conversion of mass to energy —a process that does not involve matter-antimatter interaction— has radically altered the theory of physical length contraction. It is argued that while atoms and molecules (and therefore also objects) undergo length contraction during aether-referenced motion the constituent fundamental particles themselves, on the other hand, do not! Fundamental particles actually undergo a strictly limited elongation. Based on the sound evidence and supporting theory that all elementary particles are configurations of photons, four supporting arguments are presented: (i) Particle elongation facilitates the conservation of its total intrinsic energy. (ii) The decrease of mass (as defined) becomes necessary with increased motion (with respect to aether). (iii) Elongation provides the key element in the mechanism of mass-to-energy conversion. A noninteraction-hundred-percent conversion (i.e., no particle-antiparticle annihilations is involved). (iv) The preclusion of the formation of singularity-type black holes, thus avoiding the associated infinity problems. Under the traditional view one cannot combine unrestricted length contraction and energy conservation —not in a realistic way. And for this very reason the long-standing rule has been that a mass particle/object can never attain lightspeed. And that rule, in turn, has led to a failure to understand the nature of the strangest objects of the Universe —Terminal neutron stars. The new interpretation overcomes this difficulty. The essential point being advanced is that Nature has a way for the total conversion of mass to energy. It accomplishes this by changing the gravitational environment —by subjecting “stationary” mass to lightspeed aether flow, compelling mass to undergo conversion, which requires length elongation.

Published in International Journal of High Energy Physics (Volume 6, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijhep.20190601.11
Page(s) 1-12
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Electron Model, Electron Propagation, Nonmaterial Aether, Relativistic Mass, Intrinsic Mass and Energy, Mass-Energy Conversion, Terminal Neutron Star, DSSU Theory

References
[1] Internet article: Electron, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron (2018-12-26).
[2] Qiu‐Hong Hu. (2004) The Nature of the Electron, Physics Essays Vol.17, No.4, pp. 442-458 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4006/1.3025708.
[3] Williamson, J. G. and van der Mark, M. B. (1997) Is the Electron a Photon With Toroidal Topology? Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, Vol.22, No.2, 133.
[4] Okun, L. B. (1989) The Concept of Mass, Physics Today, V.42, No.6, 31. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.881171 ).
[5] Wheeler, J. A. and Taylor, E. F. (1966) Chap 2. in Spacetime Physics. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco. P121.
[6] Ranzan, C. (2018) The Nature of Gravity –How one factor unifies gravity’s convergent, divergent, vortex, and wave effects, International Journal of Astrophysics and Space Science (IJASS), Vol.6, No.5, pp.73-92. (Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.11648/j.ijass.20180605.11).
[7] Einstein, A. (1952) Relativity The Special and the General Theory. Wings Books, New York, 1961edition. P57.
[8] Epstein, H. I. (2009) Could Mass Decrease With Velocity? Physics Essays, Vol.22, No.4, pp511-516. (http://dx.doi.org/10.4006/1.3227028 )
[9] Harrison, E. R. (1981) Cosmology the Science of the Universe. Cambridge University Press, U. K. P191.
[10] Ranzan C. (2013) The Physical Nature of Length Contraction, Applied Physics Research, Vol.5, No.1. (Doi: 10.5539/apr.v5n1p87).
[11] Williamson, J. G. (2008) On the nature of the electron and other particles, Presentation at The Cybernetics Society 40th Anniversary Annual Conference (2008 Sept 20) in London. (www.cybsoc.org/cybcon2008prog.htm).
[12] Ouspensky, P. D. (1931) A New Model of the Universe (originally published by Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., 1931. (Vintage Books edition, N. Y., 1971) P360.
[13] Wheeler, J. A. and Taylor, E. F. (1966) Chap 2. in Spacetime Physics. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco. P116.
[14] Okun, L. B. (1989) The Concept of Mass, Physics Today, V.42, No.6, 31. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.881171 ) P31.
[15] Ranzan, C. (2018) Natural Mechanism for the Generation and Emission of Extreme Energy Particles, Physics Essays, Vol.31, No.3, pp.358-376. (Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4006/0836-1398-31.3.358).
[16] Ranzan, C. (2019) Nature’s Supreme Mechanism for Energy Extraction from Nonmaterial Aether, Infinite Energy, Vol.25, Issue#144. (http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue144/index.html).
[17] Ranzan, C. (2019) Mass-to-Energy Conversion, the Astrophysical Mechanism, Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology (JHEPGC) Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 520-551. (Doi: https://doi.org 10.4236/jhepgc.2019.52030).
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Conrad Ranzan. (2019). Physical Nature of Length Contraction (Part 2) How the Electron Elongates While Its Orbit Contracts. International Journal of High Energy Physics, 6(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijhep.20190601.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Conrad Ranzan. Physical Nature of Length Contraction (Part 2) How the Electron Elongates While Its Orbit Contracts. Int. J. High Energy Phys. 2019, 6(1), 1-12. doi: 10.11648/j.ijhep.20190601.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Conrad Ranzan. Physical Nature of Length Contraction (Part 2) How the Electron Elongates While Its Orbit Contracts. Int J High Energy Phys. 2019;6(1):1-12. doi: 10.11648/j.ijhep.20190601.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijhep.20190601.11,
      author = {Conrad Ranzan},
      title = {Physical Nature of Length Contraction (Part 2) How the Electron Elongates While Its Orbit Contracts},
      journal = {International Journal of High Energy Physics},
      volume = {6},
      number = {1},
      pages = {1-12},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijhep.20190601.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijhep.20190601.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijhep.20190601.11},
      abstract = {The recent discovery of the process/mechanism of the total conversion of mass to energy —a process that does not involve matter-antimatter interaction— has radically altered the theory of physical length contraction. It is argued that while atoms and molecules (and therefore also objects) undergo length contraction during aether-referenced motion the constituent fundamental particles themselves, on the other hand, do not! Fundamental particles actually undergo a strictly limited elongation. Based on the sound evidence and supporting theory that all elementary particles are configurations of photons, four supporting arguments are presented: (i) Particle elongation facilitates the conservation of its total intrinsic energy. (ii) The decrease of mass (as defined) becomes necessary with increased motion (with respect to aether). (iii) Elongation provides the key element in the mechanism of mass-to-energy conversion. A noninteraction-hundred-percent conversion (i.e., no particle-antiparticle annihilations is involved). (iv) The preclusion of the formation of singularity-type black holes, thus avoiding the associated infinity problems. Under the traditional view one cannot combine unrestricted length contraction and energy conservation —not in a realistic way. And for this very reason the long-standing rule has been that a mass particle/object can never attain lightspeed. And that rule, in turn, has led to a failure to understand the nature of the strangest objects of the Universe —Terminal neutron stars. The new interpretation overcomes this difficulty. The essential point being advanced is that Nature has a way for the total conversion of mass to energy. It accomplishes this by changing the gravitational environment —by subjecting “stationary” mass to lightspeed aether flow, compelling mass to undergo conversion, which requires length elongation.},
     year = {2019}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Physical Nature of Length Contraction (Part 2) How the Electron Elongates While Its Orbit Contracts
    AU  - Conrad Ranzan
    Y1  - 2019/05/23
    PY  - 2019
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijhep.20190601.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijhep.20190601.11
    T2  - International Journal of High Energy Physics
    JF  - International Journal of High Energy Physics
    JO  - International Journal of High Energy Physics
    SP  - 1
    EP  - 12
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2376-7448
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijhep.20190601.11
    AB  - The recent discovery of the process/mechanism of the total conversion of mass to energy —a process that does not involve matter-antimatter interaction— has radically altered the theory of physical length contraction. It is argued that while atoms and molecules (and therefore also objects) undergo length contraction during aether-referenced motion the constituent fundamental particles themselves, on the other hand, do not! Fundamental particles actually undergo a strictly limited elongation. Based on the sound evidence and supporting theory that all elementary particles are configurations of photons, four supporting arguments are presented: (i) Particle elongation facilitates the conservation of its total intrinsic energy. (ii) The decrease of mass (as defined) becomes necessary with increased motion (with respect to aether). (iii) Elongation provides the key element in the mechanism of mass-to-energy conversion. A noninteraction-hundred-percent conversion (i.e., no particle-antiparticle annihilations is involved). (iv) The preclusion of the formation of singularity-type black holes, thus avoiding the associated infinity problems. Under the traditional view one cannot combine unrestricted length contraction and energy conservation —not in a realistic way. And for this very reason the long-standing rule has been that a mass particle/object can never attain lightspeed. And that rule, in turn, has led to a failure to understand the nature of the strangest objects of the Universe —Terminal neutron stars. The new interpretation overcomes this difficulty. The essential point being advanced is that Nature has a way for the total conversion of mass to energy. It accomplishes this by changing the gravitational environment —by subjecting “stationary” mass to lightspeed aether flow, compelling mass to undergo conversion, which requires length elongation.
    VL  - 6
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Astrophysics Department, DSSU Research, Niagara Falls, Ontario, Canada

  • Sections