This paper presents a robustness of the proposed generalized minimum variance algorithm. The main idea is to use artificial neural network for generalization of the GMV. This will give a neural network-based control method wich can be applied to civil engineering structures. The neural network learns the control task from an already existing controller, which is the generalized minimum variance (GMV) controller. The objective is to take advantage of the generalization capabilities and the nonlinear behavior of neural networks in order to overcome the limitations of the existing controller and even to improve its performances. Simulation results demonstrate the robustness of this algorithm and its capability to compensate the structural parameter variations and seismic ground motion.
Published in | Automation, Control and Intelligent Systems (Volume 1, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.acis.20130101.12 |
Page(s) | 7-15 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2013. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Structural Control, Neural Networks, Generalized Minimum Variance Control
[1] | K. J. Åström, "Introduction to stochastic control theory", Academic Press, 1970. |
[2] | K. J. Åström, "theory and applications of self tuning regu-lators", Automatica, 13(99), 457-476, |
[3] | Pergamon press, (1977).K. J. Åström, "Computer-controlled systems", Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1990. |
[4] | M.M. Al Imam and M. M. Mustapha,Robust minimum variance controller using over parametrized controller; ARPN Journal of Engineering and applied Sciences, vol 4; NO 10,pp11-18 December 2009 |
[5] | M.M. Al Imam and M. M. Mustapha , A Robust Controller for output variance reduction and minimum with application on permanent Field DC Motor; world Academy of science and technology , pp703-708, December 2009 |
[6] | K. Bani-Hani and J. Ghaboussi, "Nonlinear structural control using neural networks", J. eng. mech., ASCE 124(3), 319-327 (1998). |
[7] | A. G. Chassiakos and S. F. Masri, "Modelling unknown structural systems through the use of neural networks", Earthquake eng. struct. Dyn. 25, 117-128, (1996). |
[8] | D. W. Clarke, "Introduction to self tuning controller", IEE, Control Eng. Series 15, H. Nichelson and B. H. Swanick, "self tuning and adaptive control : theory and application", Peter pregrinus, 1981. |
[9] | D. W. Clarke, "Self tuning control of non-minimum phase systems", Automatica 20(5), 501-517, (1984). |
[10] | R. W. Clough and J. Penzien, "Dynamics of structures", McGraw-Hill, New York, 1993. |
[11] | J. P. Conte, A. J. Durrani and R. O. Shelton, "Response emulation of multistory buildings using neural networks", Proc. First World Conf. Struct. Control, WP1, 59-68, (1994). |
[12] | P. J. Gawthrop, "Some interpretations of self tuning controller", Proc. IEE 124(10), 889-894, (1977) |
[13] | J. Ghaboussi and A. Joghatie, "Active control of structures using neural networks", J. eng. mech., ASCE 121(4), 555-567, (1995). |
[14] | L. Guenfaf, N. Bali, R. Illoul and M. S. Boucherit, "Perfor-mances study of multirate generalized minimum variance algorithm applied to robotic manipulators", ITHURS’96, International conference, ENG’95 with IEEE. |
[15] | L.Guenfaf, "On the use of automatic control and neural networks in structural dynamics," Phd Thesis, 2001, LCP, ENP, Algiers, Algeria. |
[16] | L.Guenfaf and Al, "Generalized minimum variance control for buildings under seismic ground motion", Earthquake Eng. Strut. Dyn., Vol 30, Issue 7, pp945-960, 2001. |
[17] | M.J. Grimble Non-linear generalized minimum variance feedback, feedforward and tracking control Automatica 41 (2005) pp 957 – 969 Elsevier |
[18] | G. W. Housner and Al, "Structural control: past, present and future", J. eng. mech., Special issue ASCE 123(9), 897-970, (1997). |
[19] | A. Patetea, K. Furuta, M. Tomizuka Self-tuning control based on generalized minimum variance criterion for auto-regressive models Automatica 44 (2008) pp1970–1975 |
[20] | H. A. Smith, W. -H. Wu and R. I. Borja, "Structural control considering soil-structure interaction effects’" Earthquake eng. struct. Dyn. 23, 609-626, (1994). |
[21] | P. Venini and Y.-K. Wen, "Hybrid vibration control of MDOF hysteretic structures with neural networks", Proc. First World Conf. Struct. Control, TA3, 53-6, (1994). |
[22] | J. N. Yang, A. Akbapour and P. ghaemmaghami, "New optimal control algorithms for structural control", J. eng. mech. ASCE 113(9), 1369-1386, (1987). |
[23] | G. G. Yen, "Reconfigurable learning control in large space structures", IEEE Trans. On Control Sys. Technol., 362-371, (1994). |
APA Style
L. Guenfaf, M. Djebiri, M. S. Boucherit, F. Boudjema. (2013). Robust Generalized Minimum Variance Controller Using Neural Network for Civil Engineering Problems. Automation, Control and Intelligent Systems, 1(1), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.acis.20130101.12
ACS Style
L. Guenfaf; M. Djebiri; M. S. Boucherit; F. Boudjema. Robust Generalized Minimum Variance Controller Using Neural Network for Civil Engineering Problems. Autom. Control Intell. Syst. 2013, 1(1), 7-15. doi: 10.11648/j.acis.20130101.12
AMA Style
L. Guenfaf, M. Djebiri, M. S. Boucherit, F. Boudjema. Robust Generalized Minimum Variance Controller Using Neural Network for Civil Engineering Problems. Autom Control Intell Syst. 2013;1(1):7-15. doi: 10.11648/j.acis.20130101.12
@article{10.11648/j.acis.20130101.12, author = {L. Guenfaf and M. Djebiri and M. S. Boucherit and F. Boudjema}, title = {Robust Generalized Minimum Variance Controller Using Neural Network for Civil Engineering Problems}, journal = {Automation, Control and Intelligent Systems}, volume = {1}, number = {1}, pages = {7-15}, doi = {10.11648/j.acis.20130101.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.acis.20130101.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.acis.20130101.12}, abstract = {This paper presents a robustness of the proposed generalized minimum variance algorithm. The main idea is to use artificial neural network for generalization of the GMV. This will give a neural network-based control method wich can be applied to civil engineering structures. The neural network learns the control task from an already existing controller, which is the generalized minimum variance (GMV) controller. The objective is to take advantage of the generalization capabilities and the nonlinear behavior of neural networks in order to overcome the limitations of the existing controller and even to improve its performances. Simulation results demonstrate the robustness of this algorithm and its capability to compensate the structural parameter variations and seismic ground motion.}, year = {2013} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Robust Generalized Minimum Variance Controller Using Neural Network for Civil Engineering Problems AU - L. Guenfaf AU - M. Djebiri AU - M. S. Boucherit AU - F. Boudjema Y1 - 2013/02/20 PY - 2013 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.acis.20130101.12 DO - 10.11648/j.acis.20130101.12 T2 - Automation, Control and Intelligent Systems JF - Automation, Control and Intelligent Systems JO - Automation, Control and Intelligent Systems SP - 7 EP - 15 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5591 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.acis.20130101.12 AB - This paper presents a robustness of the proposed generalized minimum variance algorithm. The main idea is to use artificial neural network for generalization of the GMV. This will give a neural network-based control method wich can be applied to civil engineering structures. The neural network learns the control task from an already existing controller, which is the generalized minimum variance (GMV) controller. The objective is to take advantage of the generalization capabilities and the nonlinear behavior of neural networks in order to overcome the limitations of the existing controller and even to improve its performances. Simulation results demonstrate the robustness of this algorithm and its capability to compensate the structural parameter variations and seismic ground motion. VL - 1 IS - 1 ER -